Theme and Variations

My school's Admissions Committee convened for the first time this week, and what an interesting experience!  I am pleased to say that my gut feeling about the applicants I interviewed was nearly identical to that of the other committee members who interviewed the same applicants.  That's not to say the process is perfect (it's not!), but it's reassuring to know that my advice to you is on target.

Below are some of the themes that consistently emerged when interviewers discussed interviewees who did not receive the highest marks.

The applicant:

• spoke at a volume that was too loud or soft to comfortably hear.
• was disorganized in the way he or she spoke about experiences well known to him or her.
• was unable to recapitulate concepts that had been eloquently described in the written application.
• passed blame to someone else for low grades in courses, missed opportunities, etc.

In the end, my first Admissions Committee meeting was far more contentious than I expected.  But, the above themes consistently led to applicants receiving less favorable reviews that they likely would have preferred.  Take home points:

• Speak at a comfortable volume.  Ask the interviewer if you're unsure.
• Be organized in your discussions, and in particular, be able to fluently discuss your application.  (An applicant I interviewed had incredible leadership experiences listed in her application, but when I asked her to describe a time when she had demonstrated leadership, she could not think of an example.)
• Don't ever lay blame in an interview, even if it's true.  Past circumstances are a superb way to demonstrate personal growth.