False Alarm

Alas, my soon-to-be alma mater did not send admissions decisions yesterday (this is precisely why they tell applicants "any time in March" so that you don't get your hopes crushed when there is a delay).  Like you, I am hoping for today so that I can call and email the applicants I interviewed and say COME HERE!

Out last Admissions Committee meeting of the year is next week, so there will be a few additional decisions trickle out.

In the Mail

My school is sending out the first batch of acceptances today!  Good luck everyone.

Interview Madness

My own interview madness, that is!

When I started this blog, I imagined that my own residency interview season would be the perfect time to write a blog for medical school applicants and interviewees.  I envisioned conducting interviews for my medical school's admissions committee while traveling the country for my own interviews all the while sitting on tarmacs updating my blog and reflecting on the irony of sitting on both sides of the interview table.

Needless to say, I've interviewed a lot of medical school applicants, had the good fortune of attending 26 of my own interviews (!!), and in fact, I have done a lot of reflecting on the challenges of being both the interviewer and the interviewee.  The part that is lacking is...the BLOGGING!  And for this, I am sincerely sorry.

More to come soon.  In the meantime, I hope you will find this comment reply helpful.

I Like You

It's an awkward thing to say in a relationship, and the same goes for expressing interest to medical schools (this is in response to a comment from November 28.) I have several thoughts on this issue.

- It's late enough (now) in the interview season that you are likely starting to have a sense for which medical schools will be your top choices. You see, at the beginning of interview season, when an applicant says, "I like you," I think to myself, "I don't believe you." How could you know?! There are too many fish in the sea. But by now, you've sewn some oats; expressing sincere interest means something. So, one potential thing is to overtly express interest when you send your thank you notes. Something like...

"I have nearly completed my interviews, and I anticipate that ___ with be one of my very top choices. I would be absolutely delighted to become a medical student at ___."

- That said, saying it in a thank you note is not enough. I HIGHLY recommend sending a letter of interest to your top choice. But, be cautious. You should not be sending multiple letters of interest. Your word means something. While the above comment could be sent in thank yous to, say, your top three choices, a letter of interest should be sent to just one. I would send it electronically so that it can easily be forwarded (if necessary) and so that it makes it into your electronic file. Be brief, personal, and sincere. Say why you think the school is a good fit (as opposed to just saying that it is a good fit).

Just yesterday, I was chatting with a current first year at my school who says that this time last year she knew my school was her first choice. She sent an email to one of her interviewers because she had been waitlisted, and he recommended that she write a letter to the admissions committee expressing her sincere interest in attending. Although a waitlist is a slightly different scenario, she was delighted to report she got in shortly thereafter. Admissions committees often look kindly upon these communications. You have nothing to lose, so go for it! If you message me, I will happily review yours.

What Not to Say

A gem from my interview with an applicant this week: It is not ok to use the term "douche-bag" in an interview, particularly when describing another individual.

Sunday Funny

One of my friends, an assistant to the Director of Admissions at a graduate school, recently shared with me this:

"[S]miley faces have their appropriate settings: text messages between friends, on a child's spelling test, and even from the greeter at Wal-mart. An example of an inappropriate setting might be, let's say, on a personal autobiography statement for your grad school application. Especially in lieu of appropriate sentence endings (i.e. a period)."

There are plenty of qualified applicants out there, and the folks who read applications are pretty much searching for a reason not to read further.  Try not to give them one, or at least not one so obvious :)

Don't Blow It

Simple enough advice, but tremendously challenging for many applicants: don't blow the interview.

My school's Admissions Committee met again this week, and I was surprised that applicants' "numbers" (GPA, MCAT score) and overall qualifications came up only twice during a whole evening of discussion.  Instead, what dominated the dialogue was the interview content. 

Highlights:

• One applicant was described as "lacking depth."  He was apparently unable to elaborate upon some of the observations he made in his personal statement about differences between the US healthcare system and healthcare systems elsewhere.  
• Another applicant was marked down because the interviewer was unable to get him "off script."  Often, interviewers are truly trying to get to know you.  For example, when they ask what you do for fun, it's not a trick; they really want to know what you enjoy.  This is not an opportunity to say something about how much you love sports because they have taught you about working in teams and developing as a leader.  It's enough that you love sports.  Save the additional details for when you're asked a more appropriate question.
• One applicant was described as "weird."  There are plenty of extremely normal smart folks out there.  Being a bit unique is nice; being gross is not.
• Finally, an applicant was described as arrogant.  This is a big problem.  Every future doctor is proud of their achievements, but a little humility goes a long way.  It's not too much to ask you to be humble for 30 straight minutes.

Remember:

• Everything in your application is fair game.  If you are unable to expand upon your coursework, activities, or topics you discussed in your application materials, read up.
• Regardless of how much you've rehearsed, try to ad lib a bit.  This will become even more challenging as the interview season continues.  Relax.  Chat.
• Don't be "that guy."  For example, if you lived and bathed in a park during part of undergraduate, you might just keep this to yourself.  Really.
• Be poised and confident.  Don't be cocky.  Often it's not what you say, it's how you say it.

Comment Follow Up - Thinking of Thanking

Last week, I emphasized the importance of thanking interviewers, and I received a Comment today that I feel merits further discussion.  Don't loose sleep over this issue, but here are my thoughts:

Writing thank you notes will not get you into medical school, and choosing not to write them will not keep you out.  Writing thank yous isn't about good karma, or paying it forward, or hoping for more points on your interviewers' evaluations.  It's simply the right thing to do. 

For one thing, you will be a student at one of the schools at which you're interviewing in less than a year (!!).  While you may never see your interviewers from the other schools again, your interviewers from the school you will attend are likely to be lecturers, attendings, and even mentors in your very near future.  Thanking them is the courteous and professional thing to do.  Some of these interviewers may one day be your colleagues.

Additionally, writing thank you notes is also about creating allies who can help you with your decision making process.  Come spring, you may be making some difficult decisions, and it's nice to have established rapport with some of the very people who can help clarify questions for you. 

Finally, it's just nice.  People like nice people, and it's nice to be a nice person.  This season, I have received multiple thank you notes, and on every occasion except one, I had already completed my evaluation of the applicant by the time the thank you arrived.  But, the fact that they wrote notes to thank me for my time was very meaningful and makes me think highly of applicants I had already decided I really liked.

Certainly, if you have been told not to thank your interviewers (maybe Stanford does this?), it would be inappropriate to do so.  (As an aside, learning to properly follow instructions, even silly ones, is an important part of the medical school process.  Earlier this year, I had a Residency Program Director tell me that applicants who did not follow the instructions to list prior education in reverse chronological order were not invited for interview regardless of how qualified they were!)  However, it's hard for me to imagine a school specifically instructing you not to thank someone.  Do you really want to go to that school?  And, if your thank you note borders on coercion, I suggest you tone down the language. 

I love reader Comments.  Keep commenting.

Action

Institutional Action, that is.

I recently reviewed the application of a young man who answered "Yes" to the question regarding "Institutional Action" on his AMCAS application.  Although he could not have known at the time, his application and letters of recommendation actually include no mention of his infraction.  However, I feel he did the right thing by being forthcoming because the consequences would have been significant if a letter or institutional endorsement had mentioned his infraction and he had not.  Moreover, I was impressed by his response because he 1) explained the scenario (he had an unopened alcoholic beverage in hand and falsely reported his name and age), 2) took full responsibility for his actions, and 3) demonstrated personal growth as a result (not only did he perform required community service, but he continued to volunteer at the same place for the remainder of undergrad).

Impressive.

Danke Schoen

I really cannot emphasize enough how much Thank You notes after interviews matter. Previously, I've mentioned Thank Yous here and here. I have actually been quite surprised how few Thank You notes I have received this season. Perhaps this is in part due to the fact that I'm a student conducting interviews, but given that I have equal weight on the committee as my more senior colleagues, I think this is a mistake.

Although I'm editing to ensure anonymity (both for me and the applicant), I received a Thank You note via email this evening very similar to the one below, and it blew me away. I found the applicant to be appropriately gracious while continuing to sell herself as an applicant and also mentioning specific details of things we discussed during the interview. Kudos to this applicant! I thought she was terrific when I interviewed her, and this just confirms what I already knew.

Dear ______,

Thank you so much for the opportunity to interview at *** Medical School on Tuesday. I was really impressed by ***'s top-notch facilities; I was especially amazed that ***. I was also impressed with the innovative PBL curriculum, which seems to be an excellent match with my experience working in small groups as an undergraduate and in my current job. I loved the location and would love to be in *** near my family during medical school.

Thank you again for taking the time out of your busy schedule to meet with me. *** is on the top of my list of medical schools. I really appreciate your consideration for entrance into the Class of 2016. Good luck with your residency interviews!

Sincerely,
_____

I Prefer Multiple Mini Snickers

I had every intention of blogging soon after my first interview, but between the hectic nature of traveling (always! right?), packing for a brief trip home, attending my high school's Homecoming, and studying for the USMLE Step II CS (tomorrow!), it's been a bit of a crazy week.  The interview went really well and reminded me of the medical school interview process, although the lunch was much better. 

Interestingly, my first interview day had two primary components: a traditional interview and multiple mini interviews (MMI).  You may have read about MMI's here (or some naysayers critiques here).  In general, the format uses ethical conundrums, patient vignettes, or real-life challenges to assess how the applicant will respond after taking a brief time to ponder the scenario.  I enjoyed the contrast between the two formats and felt as though the MMI enabled me to paint a more complete composite picture of myself as an applicant.

Has anyone experienced the MMI format yet during interviews?  Please comment and tell me what you thought, your advice for other people, the strengths and weakness of the experience, etc.

What Goes Around Comes Around

After two weeks of conducting medical school admissions interviews, I will be sitting on the other side of the desk tomorrow.  It's my first residency interview!  From the applicants I have interviewed thus far, I have learned a tremendous amount about body language, humility, and poise, and I'm looking forward (albeit a little bit anxiously) to tomorrow's opportunity to practice what I preach.  I hope this experience will make me an empathetic interviewer and also give me the opportunity to self-assess my own strengths and weaknesses as an interviewee so that I can regroup for my next interviews in October.  Updates to come.

Theme and Variations

My school's Admissions Committee convened for the first time this week, and what an interesting experience!  I am pleased to say that my gut feeling about the applicants I interviewed was nearly identical to that of the other committee members who interviewed the same applicants.  That's not to say the process is perfect (it's not!), but it's reassuring to know that my advice to you is on target.

Below are some of the themes that consistently emerged when interviewers discussed interviewees who did not receive the highest marks.

The applicant:

• spoke at a volume that was too loud or soft to comfortably hear.
• was disorganized in the way he or she spoke about experiences well known to him or her.
• was unable to recapitulate concepts that had been eloquently described in the written application.
• passed blame to someone else for low grades in courses, missed opportunities, etc.

In the end, my first Admissions Committee meeting was far more contentious than I expected.  But, the above themes consistently led to applicants receiving less favorable reviews that they likely would have preferred.  Take home points:

• Speak at a comfortable volume.  Ask the interviewer if you're unsure.
• Be organized in your discussions, and in particular, be able to fluently discuss your application.  (An applicant I interviewed had incredible leadership experiences listed in her application, but when I asked her to describe a time when she had demonstrated leadership, she could not think of an example.)
• Don't ever lay blame in an interview, even if it's true.  Past circumstances are a superb way to demonstrate personal growth.

Sunday Funny

This is Why We Knock

Once in medical school, you will learn all sorts of reasons why doctors knock on patients' doors before entering their rooms in the hospital, although certainly common courtesy seems the most compelling to me.

Last week, I knocked my a patient's door (a mid-40's female) before entering her room, and when I did not hear a response, I wondered, "Could something be wrong?" I knocked again, paused to listen for a response, and then entered. And there she was, lying in her hospital bed with her hospital-issued gown wide open in the front, no sign of undergarments anywhere, and her boyfriend lying in the bed right next to her!

That is why we knock. Loudly.

The (Body) Linguist

Unfortunately, I am decidedly less enthusiastic about the candidate I interviewed yesterday compared with the young man from Tuesday. After pretty much devouring her written application, I was eager for our conversation but left with a sour taste in my mouth. However, I am going to withhold most details for now because my Admissions Committee meets next week, and I want to determine whether my evaluation of the applicant is similar to that of other Committee members.

For now, my thoughts on body language.

The applicant from Tuesday had some of the best body language I have ever observed. He made excellent eye contact throughout the interview, resisting the temptation to look at the floor or to the windows for inspiration during difficult questions. Similarly, when I responded to his questions, he continued to maintain eye contact and appear sincerely engaged. His hands were folded in his lab or on the armrest of the chair for the entire interview except for his firm, reassuring handshakes at both the beginning and ends of the interview. All of this is worth taking note of and attempting to emulate, although certainly a difficult task. In a similar way, the applicant from Thursday had very appropriate body language when she was speaking. She used her hands somewhat more while talking, but I found this to be tasteful and acceptable because it was appropriate in context. However, during the time when I answered her questions, she became extraordinarily fidgety. It was as if she thought I would be so wrapped up in my own responses that I might not notice her ongoing presence in the room. She fluffed her hair (fairly dramatically), adjusted her glasses, straightened her skirt, etc. It was so distracting! Given her sincerity, I am positive she did not mean to be disrespectful, but I was struck by the suggestion that things she said were important and things I said were simply an obligatory part of the interview.

Be cautious. Body language is too important to put on autopilot. Think about your actions and how they appear. If need be, practice answering questions in front of a mirror or with someone you trust. Become aware of your tendencies. As my grandmother said to my (occasionally bickering) siblings and I siting in the back of her car, "Be still."

The Conversationalist

"Interview" is really a misnomer for the conversation that occurs between an applicant and Admissions Committee member. Interview seems to imply that one person is asking the questions, really grilling the other person, while the applicant spitfires rehearsed, trite, and long-winded answers. An interview does not at all describe what transpired between me and the first applicant with whom I spoke today. (Yes, I was scheduled for my first "interview" on Thursday, but a physician interviewer canceled, and I was recruited to take his place.)

Have a conversation with your interviewer. In fact, having a conversation is precisely what my Dean of Admissions instructed interviewers to do - to coax a conversation out of the applicant, to assess the genuineness and spontaneity of his or her answers, and to discern whether the applicant responds to the interviewer's facial expressions and body language, particularly when explaining potentially challenging topics such as research endeavors.

Today's applicant did a fantastic job embodying the conversationalist approach to interviews. I was impressed by his consistent eye contact, lack of fidgeting, and natural intuition regarding my level of interest in the things he described. In truth, the young man I interviewed today was far from the most outstanding applicant with whom I will speak this season, but his poise, sincerity, and articulateness were more than enough to impress me. "Two thumbs up."

Start Your Engines

For the most part, I applied to be on my school's admissions committee because of my interest in medical education. Ultimately, I hope to conduct research and teach medical students and residents at a large, academic institution, and as a result, most of my extracurricular activities in medical school have related to medical education in some way - curriculum development task forces, institutional accreditation committees, teaching and tutoring, etc. A year on the admissions committee seemed very consistent with my endeavors and sounded like a fun and educational way to give back to my school. Nonetheless, a portion of my motivation for joining the admissions committee was my desire to get a insider's look at the admissions process. Along with the other student committee members, I met with my school's Dean of Admissions yesterday to discuss the beginning of interview season. I have to tell you, I am absolutely giddy with excitement about the whole process getting underway.

Of course, I cannot share with you the specific rubrics we use to assess applicants or the voting procedures themselves. But, what I can do is continue to provide nuggets of information that will hopefully demystify the process and help you in your pursuit of the right school. Most importantly, what I learned at the meeting yesterday is that there is no "formula" for the perfect applicant. MCAT scores, GPAs, research, extracurriculars, and many other components are intimately interweaved and make each applicant very different. As my Dean of Admissions explained, every applicant we interview is qualified to attend our institution. In fact, about 1,000 of the applicants who don't get interviews are also qualified. Interviews go a long way toward distinguishing candidates, and ultimately the committee's gestalt coupled with some good luck leads to the creation of another diverse and immensely talented group of future physicians.

Stay tuned in. I'm conducting my first applicant interview on Thursday, and I can't wait to share with you what I learn about the process so that I can continue to provide with you honest and reliable advice.

Policy Prep

The state of American health care. This is a topic that terrified me when I was in your shoes four years ago (Fall 2007 - the 2008 election was just a year away, and "the health care debate" was all the rage). Even now, after almost four years of studying the health care system, reading about it, attending lectures, and observing as patients and physicians alike navigate though it, I admit to being confused. It is nearly impossible to master this ever-changing system, and luckily no interviewer is going to expect that of you.

That said, some interviewers will be more eager than others to talk shop. It simply can't hurt to have a few comments to contribute. The best way to do this is to keep up with current events. I recommend making a point to spend about 10 minutes each day reading about health care policy in the national paper of your choice. For me, that's the New York Times (click the Health link), but the Wall Street Journal also has great relevant pieces, as do other papers and news outlets with which I'm less familiar. Having an "issue" oriented approach to preparing rather than trying to learn the nitty-gritty of the health care system will prove much more fruitful (and much more fun). While you're at it, you may find interesting articles unrelated to policy but very relevant to the topics discussed on the interview trail. Here and here are two of my recent favorites.

In the Neighborhood

Many applicants apply to schools in "geographic clusters" - for example, every school in Chicago, New York, or northern California. If you don't live near your geographic clusters, then it is certainly ideal to avoid traveling back and forth multiple times. Sometimes, a brief email to the admissions office can alleviate your travel woes.  A sample:

Dear ___,  

I recently learned I will be in Boston on September 22 for an interview at another institution. Would it be at all possible to accommodate me for an interview at Tufts during the same week? I am very interested in interviewing at Tufts, and I am hoping to minimize travel as much as possible. Thanks for helping me with this matter.

Warmest regards, 

Sam Student

Additional suggestions:

• If you know the name of the person who receives correspondence for the admissions office of interest, include it; otherwise "Dear Admissions Committee" is sufficient.
• Do not share the name of the other school. You will appear either pretentious or desperate, neither of which is desirable.
• Be succinct and kind. The administrative assistants who work in the admissions offices are the people who can make things happen for you! 
• Finally, recognize this is a long shot. Some schools can and will accomodate you and others won't, but it is absolutely worth a shot.

Date Me? Errr, Update Me.

As I have previously mentioned, at almost every interview you will be asked, “Do you have any updates you would like the Admissions Committee to know about?” (previously discussed here and here).

The answer to this question is YES even if you suspect the answer may be no. Undoubtedly, you have done something between when you submitted your AMCAS and your interview! Whatever this is, you want to make it sound as good as possible.

If you have major accomplishments, publications, job changes, or leadership positions to report, then your job is easy. Practice succinctly articulating these updates. Additionally, prepare a document to leave with your interviewer. This can be a letter to the Admissions Committee, an updated CV/resume, or a bulleted list of updates. If an article was published, bring a copy. The point isn’t the format – it’s that you’re leaving a hardcopy of your update with the interviewer rather than relying on his or her memory to report these updates to the Committee. Your additions will likely become part of your applicant file. Moreover, a hardcopy of your update goes a long way toward making you look prepared, enthusiastic, and thoughtful. Bring several copies to your interview, as you will often have multiple interviews.

If you don’t have any major changes to your application, then the task may be a little more difficult. For starters, you don’t need an update letter or document – don’t highlight things that aren’t important. Instead, think of one thing you can genuinely explain to the interviewer – a new class that is engaging, a new task at your job, a new experience of some kind. Simply demonstrate that you are remaining engaged as your conquer the application and interview process.